Gayblack Canadian Man

Foreign Policy Analysis
Why Key Legislature Measures Fell Through

Why Key Legislature Measures Fell Through


ALBANY ALBANY — ALBANY — FAILED ALBANY — FAILED TO ALBANY — FAILED TO
GET ALBANY — FAILED TO
GET THROUGH ALBANY — FAILED TO
GET THROUGH THE ALBANY — FAILED TO
GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE ALBANY — FAILED TO
GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD EVENING, GET THROUGH THE
LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD EVENING, I’M LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD EVENING, I’M LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.
GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER. GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER. GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM GOOD EVENING, I’M
MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI… MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI… MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT HAS MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT HAS THE MARYALICE DEMLER.
AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT AND I’M ADAM BENIGNI…
SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF. SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF. SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF.
NOW SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF.
NOW THAT SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION SCOTT HAS THE NIGHT
OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON OFF.
NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON YOUR NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON YOUR NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS NOW THAT SESSION IS
OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS HOLDING OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS HOLDING OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE IN OVER — 2 ON YOUR
SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE IN POWER SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE IN POWER SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE SIDE IS HOLDING
PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE — PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE — PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN PEOPLE IN POWER
ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO ACCOUNTABLE —
TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO FIND TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO FIND TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT TRACKING DOWN OUR
LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER THE LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER THE PAST LAW MAKERS — TO FIND
OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER THE PAST 6 OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER THE PAST 6 OUT WHAT HAPPENED
OVER THE PAST 6
MONTHS. OVER THE PAST 6
MONTHS. OVER THE PAST 6
MONTHS.
WE OVER THE PAST 6
MONTHS.
WE HAVE OVER THE PAST 6
MONTHS.
WE HAVE TEAM MONTHS.
WE HAVE TEAM MONTHS.
WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE MONTHS.
WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT MONTHS.
WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT — WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT — WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT —
STARTING WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT —
STARTING WITH WE HAVE TEAM
COVERAGE TONIGHT —
STARTING WITH EMILY COVERAGE TONIGHT —
STARTING WITH EMILY COVERAGE TONIGHT —
STARTING WITH EMILY
LAMPA. STARTING WITH EMILY
LAMPA. STARTING WITH EMILY
LAMPA.
EMILY? LAMPA.
EMILY? EMILY? MARYALICE, MARYALICE, ADAM… MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT TO MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT TO A MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF MARYALICE, ADAM…
WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF OUT WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF OUT WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY BASED WE REACHED OUT TO A
NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY BASED STATE NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY BASED STATE NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS NUMBER OF OUT
LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS TODAY. LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS TODAY. LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER LOCALLY BASED STATE
LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN LEGISLATORS TODAY.
BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR BUT AFTER ANOTHER
LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR STAFF LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR STAFF LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD LATE NIGHT IN ALBANY
— MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD US — MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD US — MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY — MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE — MANY OF THEIR STAFF
MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER
STILL MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL MEMBERS TOLD US
THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL — THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL — THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING THEY WERE EITHER
STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER PARTS STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER PARTS OF STILL IN THE CAPITAL —
OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER PARTS OF THE OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER PARTS OF THE OR TRAVELING IN
OTHER PARTS OF THE
STATE. OTHER PARTS OF THE
STATE. STATE. STATE.

BUT STATE.

BUT SENATOR STATE.

BUT SENATOR MIKE BUT SENATOR MIKE BUT SENATOR MIKE
RANZENHOFER BUT SENATOR MIKE
RANZENHOFER — BUT SENATOR MIKE
RANZENHOFER — MADE BUT SENATOR MIKE
RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF BUT SENATOR MIKE
RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE. RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE. RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT RANZENHOFER — MADE
HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT A HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT A HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT A
NUMBER HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT A
NUMBER OF HIMSELF AVAILABLE.
HE EXPLAINED THAT A
NUMBER OF THOSE HE EXPLAINED THAT A
NUMBER OF THOSE HE EXPLAINED THAT A
NUMBER OF THOSE
CONTROVERSIAL NUMBER OF THOSE
CONTROVERSIAL NUMBER OF THOSE
CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES NUMBER OF THOSE
CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T NUMBER OF THOSE
CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T GET CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T GET CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED BECAUSE CONTROVERSIAL
MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED BECAUSE THEY MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED BECAUSE THEY MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED BECAUSE THEY
WERE MEASURES DIDN’T GET
PASSED BECAUSE THEY
WERE COMPLICATED. PASSED BECAUSE THEY
WERE COMPLICATED. PASSED BECAUSE THEY
WERE COMPLICATED.
WE PASSED BECAUSE THEY
WERE COMPLICATED.
WE ASKED WERE COMPLICATED.
WE ASKED WERE COMPLICATED.
WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY WERE COMPLICATED.
WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING TO WE ASKED
SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING TO DO SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING TO DO SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING TO DO
WITH SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
THE BILL HAVING TO DO
WITH TEACHER THE BILL HAVING TO DO
WITH TEACHER THE BILL HAVING TO DO
WITH TEACHER
EVALUATIONS. WITH TEACHER
EVALUATIONS. WITH TEACHER
EVALUATIONS.
IT WITH TEACHER
EVALUATIONS.
IT PROPOSED EVALUATIONS.
IT PROPOSED EVALUATIONS.
IT PROPOSED
PERMANENTLY IT PROPOSED
PERMANENTLY IT PROPOSED
PERMANENTLY
DROPPING PERMANENTLY
DROPPING PERMANENTLY
DROPPING
STANDARDIZED DROPPING
STANDARDIZED DROPPING
STANDARDIZED
TESTING DROPPING
STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES DROPPING
STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES FROM STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES FROM STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES FROM
THE STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER STANDARDIZED
TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER RATING TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER RATING TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — TESTING SCORES FROM
THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — REQUIRING THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — REQUIRING THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE THE TEACHER RATING
PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE EDUCATION PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE EDUCATION PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO PROCESS — REQUIRING
THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO COME THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO COME THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO COME
UP THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO COME
UP WITH THE STATE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT TO COME
UP WITH “ALTERNATIVE DEPARTMENT TO COME
UP WITH “ALTERNATIVE DEPARTMENT TO COME
UP WITH “ALTERNATIVE
ASSESSMENTS.” UP WITH “ALTERNATIVE
ASSESSMENTS.” ASSESSMENTS.” “THEY “THEY WERE “THEY WERE HOPING “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD GO “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT “THEY WERE HOPING
THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT THAT WOULD GO
THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT WOULD THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT WOULD THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO THROUGH AND IT DIDN’T
LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO MUCH LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO MUCH LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT LOOK LIKE IT WOULD
SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE SEE TOO MUCH
OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE IT. OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE IT. OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? OPPOSITION, BUT IT
JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL, JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL, JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE OF JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE OF THE JUST NEVER MADE IT.
WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE OF THE THINGS WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE OF THE THINGS WHAT HAPPENED? WELL,
ONE OF THE THINGS
AGAIN…LIKE ONE OF THE THINGS
AGAIN…LIKE ONE OF THE THINGS
AGAIN…LIKE
COMPLICATED AGAIN…LIKE
COMPLICATED AGAIN…LIKE
COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, AGAIN…LIKE
COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I AGAIN…LIKE
COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I THINK COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I THINK COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT THE COMPLICATED
LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT THE TEACHER LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT THE TEACHER LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS LEGISLATION, I THINK
THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR THAT THE TEACHER
EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER EVALUATIONS SHOULD
STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT STAND ON THEIR OWN
AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD AND I’M A SIGNER OF
THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT THE BILL THAT DOES
THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE WAS THAT. I WOULD HAVE
LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE WAS NOT LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE WAS NOT LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT LOVED TO SEE IT GET
DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A DONE — THERE WAS NOT
THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, THAT PRESSURE
BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE BECAUSE OF A COUPLE
OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT OF THINGS. NUMBER 1, I
BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT REALLY BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT REALLY BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED BELIEVE THE GOVERNOR
WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT ISSUE WAS NOT REALLY
ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT ISSUE BUT ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT ISSUE BUT ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER ACTIVELYY INVOLVED IN
THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — THAT ISSUE BUT
NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, NUMBER TWO…THERE’S
NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, IF NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, IF NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING IS NO IMMEDIACY — OKAY
FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING IS NOT FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING IS NOT FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY FOR INSTANCE, IF
SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY IS SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY IS SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL SOMETHING IS NOT
DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020, DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020, DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT DONE…NOBODY IS
AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT AFFECTED UNTIL 2020,
SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING SO I THINK THAT GIVES
PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING ROOM PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING ROOM PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT PEOPLE A LITTLE BIT OF
BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT NO BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT NO BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO BREATHING ROOM
KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING TO KNOWING THAT NO
TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING TO BE TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING TO BE TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY TEACHER NO STUDENT
IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER AN IS GOING TO BE
ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER AN ACTION ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER AN ACTION ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER AN ACTION
WAS ADVERSELY AFFECTED
BY WHETHER AN ACTION
WAS TAKEN BY WHETHER AN ACTION
WAS TAKEN BY WHETHER AN ACTION
WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.” WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.” WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.”
WE WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED OUT WAS TAKEN
YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED OUT TO YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED OUT TO YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED OUT TO
THE YESTERDAY.”
WE REACHED OUT TO
THE BUFFALO WE REACHED OUT TO
THE BUFFALO WE REACHED OUT TO
THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS WE REACHED OUT TO
THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS FEDERATION THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS FEDERATION THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THEIR THE BUFFALO
TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THEIR REACTION TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THEIR REACTION TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THEIR REACTION
TO TEACHERS FEDERATION
FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS. FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS. FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS.
WE’RE FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO FOR THEIR REACTION
TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO ONE TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO ONE TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS AVAILABLE TO THIS.
WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS AVAILABLE FOR WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS AVAILABLE FOR WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS AVAILABLE FOR
COMMENT WE’RE TOLD NO ONE
WAS AVAILABLE FOR
COMMENT TODAY. WAS AVAILABLE FOR
COMMENT TODAY. COMMENT TODAY. SENATOR SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID IN SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE RANZENHOFER SAID IN
THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT THE CASE OF OTHER
KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT — KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT — KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE WERE KEY BILLS — LIKE THE
CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE WERE MULTIPLE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE WERE MULTIPLE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING CHILD VICTIM’S ACT —
THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL — THERE WERE MULTIPLE
COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL — WHICH COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL — WHICH COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL — WHICH
INCREASED COMPETING VERSIONS
OF THE BILL — WHICH
INCREASED THE OF THE BILL — WHICH
INCREASED THE OF THE BILL — WHICH
INCREASED THE
COMPLICATION OF THE BILL — WHICH
INCREASED THE
COMPLICATION FACTOR. INCREASED THE
COMPLICATION FACTOR. INCREASED THE
COMPLICATION FACTOR.
SENATOR COMPLICATION FACTOR.
SENATOR COMPLICATION FACTOR.
SENATOR
RANZENHOFER COMPLICATION FACTOR.
SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS COMPLICATION FACTOR.
SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS HE SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS HE SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS SENATOR
RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE RANZENHOFER SAYS HE
INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE BILL INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE BILL INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE INTRODUCED HIS OWN
VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE HOPED VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE HOPED VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE VERSION OF THE BILL
WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT WHICH HE HOPED
MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE IT MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN
TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF TRACTION — BUT IT
DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE. DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE. DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
WHAT DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT DIDN’T MAKE IT OUT OF
COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S COMMITTEE.
WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT OF WHAT WILL MAKE IT TO
THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT OF SMALLER THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT OF SMALLER THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT OF SMALLER
LOCAL THE GOVERNOR’S DESK
— A LOT OF SMALLER
LOCAL BILLS. — A LOT OF SMALLER
LOCAL BILLS. LOCAL BILLS. OUR OUR TEAM OUR TEAM COVERAGE OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON YOUR OUR TEAM COVERAGE
ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE ON THIS — CONTINUES
WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE EWING… WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE EWING… WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT WITH 2 ON YOUR SIDE’S
CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT SOME CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT SOME CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS FROM CLAUDINE EWING…
WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS FROM A WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS FROM A WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS FROM A
GOOD WHO GOT SOME
ANALYSIS FROM A
GOOD GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS FROM A
GOOD GOVERNMENT ANALYSIS FROM A
GOOD GOVERNMENT
GROUP. GOOD GOVERNMENT
GROUP. GOOD GOVERNMENT
GROUP.
… GROUP.
… … A A LOT A LOT OF A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT MANY A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO A LOT OF LEGISLATIVE
ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF ISSUES THAT MANY
VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – VOTERS WANTED TO BE
TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – WERE TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – WERE TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S TAKEN CARE OF AND
VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN VOTED ON – WERE
NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS NOT….AND THAT’S WHY
THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS IN THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS IN THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE THOSE KEEPING AN EYE
ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL OUT ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL OUT WHAT ON WHAT HAPPENS IN
THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL OUT WHAT THEY THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL OUT WHAT THEY THE STATE CAPITOL
CALL OUT WHAT THEY
SEE…. CALL OUT WHAT THEY
SEE…. SEE…. MAYBE MAYBE THIS MAYBE THIS SESSION MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT DUE MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK IN MAYBE THIS SESSION
WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK IN THE WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK IN THE WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK IN THE
STATE WAS DIFFERENT DUE
TO GRIDLOCK IN THE
STATE SENATE….NOT TO GRIDLOCK IN THE
STATE SENATE….NOT TO GRIDLOCK IN THE
STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH TO GRIDLOCK IN THE
STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH REPUBLICANS STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH REPUBLICANS STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS STATE SENATE….NOT
ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS TO ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS TO ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A ENOUGH REPUBLICANS
OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY. OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY. OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF OR DEMOCRATS TO
FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FORM A MAJORITY.
“HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.” “HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.” “HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S “HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW “HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE “HORNER: INSTEAD OF IT
SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE NEW SIZZLING IT FIZZLED.”
THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE NEW YORK THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE NEW YORK THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC THAT’S HOW THE HEAD
OF THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC INTEREST OF THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC INTEREST OF THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH OF THE NEW YORK
PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH GROUP PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH GROUP PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH GROUP
DESCRIBES PUBLIC INTEREST
RESEARCH GROUP
DESCRIBES THIS RESEARCH GROUP
DESCRIBES THIS RESEARCH GROUP
DESCRIBES THIS
LATEST RESEARCH GROUP
DESCRIBES THIS
LATEST LEGISLATIVE DESCRIBES THIS
LATEST LEGISLATIVE DESCRIBES THIS
LATEST LEGISLATIVE
SESSION. LATEST LEGISLATIVE
SESSION. LATEST LEGISLATIVE
SESSION.
BECAUSE LATEST LEGISLATIVE
SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN LATEST LEGISLATIVE
SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES SESSION.
BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES WITH BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES WITH BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD SUPPORT BECAUSE WHEN IT
COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FROM COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FROM COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FROM
THE COMES TO ISSUES WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FROM
THE PUBLIC…NOTHING BROAD SUPPORT FROM
THE PUBLIC…NOTHING BROAD SUPPORT FROM
THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE BROAD SUPPORT FROM
THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS THE PUBLIC…NOTHING
HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS APRIL HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS APRIL HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS APRIL
SIENA HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS APRIL
SIENA COLLEGE HAPPENED…TAKE A
LOOK AT THIS APRIL
SIENA COLLEGE POLL…. LOOK AT THIS APRIL
SIENA COLLEGE POLL…. LOOK AT THIS APRIL
SIENA COLLEGE POLL….
LEGALIZE SIENA COLLEGE POLL….
LEGALIZE SIENA COLLEGE POLL….
LEGALIZE
RECREATIONAL LEGALIZE
RECREATIONAL LEGALIZE
RECREATIONAL
MARIJUANA RECREATIONAL
MARIJUANA RECREATIONAL
MARIJUANA
52% RECREATIONAL
MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT RECREATIONAL
MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT IT MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT IT MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT IT
44% MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT IT
44% OPPOSE MARIJUANA
52% SUPPORT IT
44% OPPOSE IT 52% SUPPORT IT
44% OPPOSE IT 52% SUPPORT IT
44% OPPOSE IT
STATE 52% SUPPORT IT
44% OPPOSE IT
STATE LAWMAKERS 44% OPPOSE IT
STATE LAWMAKERS 44% OPPOSE IT
STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T 44% OPPOSE IT
STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT. STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT. STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT.
THE STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S STATE LAWMAKERS
DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT DIDN’T ACT.
THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT
20% THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS THE CHILD VICTIM’S ACT
74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT 74% SUPPORT IT
20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT IS 20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT IS 20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE 20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE DYSFUNCTION 20% OF VOTERS DON’T
“HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE DYSFUNCTION THAT “HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE DYSFUNCTION THAT “HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED “HORNER: PART OF IT IS
THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE THE DYSFUNCTION THAT
RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT IS RESULTED FROM
GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT IS A GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT IS A GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER GRIDLOCK IN THE STATE
SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF SENATE, PART OF IT IS A
LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF THE LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF THE LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES LACKLUSTER APPROACH
TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE TO SOME OF THE
IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT TO IMPORTANT ISSUES OF
THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE THE DAY. THE VOTERS
HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.” HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.” HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.”
AND HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.”
AND A HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.”
AND A BILL HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW
THE ANSWER.”
AND A BILL TO THE ANSWER.”
AND A BILL TO THE ANSWER.”
AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE THE ANSWER.”
AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE MONETARY AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE MONETARY AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE MONETARY
BAIL AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE MONETARY
BAIL FOR AND A BILL TO
ELIMINATE MONETARY
BAIL FOR PEOPLE ELIMINATE MONETARY
BAIL FOR PEOPLE ELIMINATE MONETARY
BAIL FOR PEOPLE
FACING BAIL FOR PEOPLE
FACING BAIL FOR PEOPLE
FACING
MISDEMEANORS BAIL FOR PEOPLE
FACING
MISDEMEANORS AND FACING
MISDEMEANORS AND FACING
MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FACING
MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FELONIES MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FELONIES MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT MISDEMEANORS AND
NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT IT NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT IT NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT IT
35% NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE NON-VIOLENT FELONIES
56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT 56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT 56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT
AND 56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN 56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE 56% SUPPORT IT
35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE STATE 35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE STATE 35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG 35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID 35% OPPOSE IT
AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID NOTHING…. AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID NOTHING…. AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: THESE AND AGAIN THE STATE
LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: THESE ARE LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: THESE ARE LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: THESE ARE
OUR LEG DID NOTHING….
“HORNER: THESE ARE
OUR ELECTED “HORNER: THESE ARE
OUR ELECTED “HORNER: THESE ARE
OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS TO OUR ELECTED
REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS TO THE REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS TO THE REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS TO THE
GREATEST REPRESENTATIVES
THEIR JOB IS TO THE
GREATEST EXTENT THEIR JOB IS TO THE
GREATEST EXTENT THEIR JOB IS TO THE
GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE THEIR JOB IS TO THE
GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE SOLVE GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE SOLVE GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS GREATEST EXTENT
POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE POSSIBLE SOLVE
PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE TO PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE TO PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST PROBLEMS THAT
PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN AND PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN AND THEY PLAGUE THE STATE TO
THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN AND THEY DID THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN AND THEY DID THE GREATEST EXTENT
THEY CAN AND THEY DID
NOT.” THEY CAN AND THEY DID
NOT.” THEY CAN AND THEY DID
NOT.”
NEW THEY CAN AND THEY DID
NOT.”
NEW YORK’S NOT.”
NEW YORK’S NOT.”
NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS NOT.”
NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS ARE NOT.”
NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED NEW YORK’S
ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED INADEQUATE ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED INADEQUATE ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN
CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD VOTER CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD VOTER CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN CALLED INADEQUATE
WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN WITH WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN WITH WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD SUPPORT WITH BAD VOTER
TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FOR TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FOR TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FOR
AUTOMATIC TURNOUT, EVEN WITH
BROAD SUPPORT FOR
AUTOMATIC VOTER BROAD SUPPORT FOR
AUTOMATIC VOTER BROAD SUPPORT FOR
AUTOMATIC VOTER
REGISTRATION AUTOMATIC VOTER
REGISTRATION AUTOMATIC VOTER
REGISTRATION
ALLOWING AUTOMATIC VOTER
REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE AUTOMATIC VOTER
REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND REGISTRATION
ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND VOTE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND VOTE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION DAY REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION DAY REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION DAY
AND REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION DAY
AND NO REGISTER AND VOTE
ON ELECTION DAY
AND NO MEANINGFUL ON ELECTION DAY
AND NO MEANINGFUL ON ELECTION DAY
AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON ELECTION DAY
AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON
CORRUPTION AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON
CORRUPTION IN AND NO MEANINGFUL
ACTION ON
CORRUPTION IN STATE ACTION ON
CORRUPTION IN STATE ACTION ON
CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT ACTION ON
CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT A CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT A CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN CORRUPTION IN STATE
GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN THE GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN THE GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION GOVERNMENT…..AT A
TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION CASE TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION CASE TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TIME WHEN THE
BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TRIAL. BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TRIAL. BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU BUFFALO BILLION CASE
IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU WOULD IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU WOULD IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT IS ON TRIAL.
“HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD “HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD “HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE “HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE “HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, “HORNER: YOU WOULD
THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THINK THAT WOULD
MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT MOVE THE ISSUE, MOVE
THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS
COMPARED THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS
COMPARED TO THE NEEDLE ON THE
ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS
COMPARED TO NOT ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS
COMPARED TO NOT ISSUE TOWARD ACT AS
COMPARED TO NOT
ACT.” COMPARED TO NOT
ACT.” COMPARED TO NOT
ACT.”
THERE’S COMPARED TO NOT
ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE – ACT.”
THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE – PAY THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE – PAY THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE – PAY
RAISES THERE’S ANOTHER
LOOMING ISSUE – PAY
RAISES FOR LOOMING ISSUE – PAY
RAISES FOR LOOMING ISSUE – PAY
RAISES FOR
LEGISLATORS LOOMING ISSUE – PAY
RAISES FOR
LEGISLATORS AND RAISES FOR
LEGISLATORS AND RAISES FOR
LEGISLATORS AND
EXECUTIVE RAISES FOR
LEGISLATORS AND
EXECUTIVE BRANCH LEGISLATORS AND
EXECUTIVE BRANCH LEGISLATORS AND
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP LEGISLATORS AND
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS. EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS. EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE WAS EXECUTIVE BRANCH
TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE WAS A TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE WAS A TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION TOP BRASS.
“HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED “HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED “HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED
IN “HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE “HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE “HORNER: THERE WAS A
COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET, COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET, COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO COMMISSION CREATED
IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC IN THE STATE BUDGET,
THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THEY HAVE YET TO HOLD
ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THE ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THE ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE LEVEL ANY PUBLIC HEARINGS
ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE LEVEL OF ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE LEVEL OF ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ABOUT WHAT IS THE
ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ” ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ” ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ”
THE ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE ADEQUATE LEVEL OF
COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A COMPENSATION ”
THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A WEEK THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A WEEK THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE THE REPORT IS DUE IN
NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE ELECTION. NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE ELECTION. NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS NOVEMBER – A WEEK
AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A RAISE AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A RAISE IN AFTER THE ELECTION.
-LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A RAISE IN 20- -LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A RAISE IN 20- -LAWMAKERS HAVEN’T
HAD A RAISE IN 20-
YEARS. HAD A RAISE IN 20-
YEARS. YEARS. USUALLY USUALLY AT USUALLY AT THE USUALLY AT THE END USUALLY AT THE END
OF USUALLY AT THE END
OF A USUALLY AT THE END
OF A LEGISLATIVE USUALLY AT THE END
OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION USUALLY AT THE END
OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE USUALLY AT THE END
OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS
DEAL OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING TO OF A LEGISLATIVE
SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING TO THE SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING TO THE SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER SESSION THERE IS
DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T SEE DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T SEE THAT DEAL MAKING TO THE
BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS BITTER END….WE
DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS
YEAR. DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS
YEAR. DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS
YEAR.
HERE’S DIDN’T SEE THAT THIS
YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, YEAR.
HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL HERE’S SOMETHING
THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH THAT DID GET DONE, A
TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS
THE TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS
THE STATE TOLL PAYER’S BILL OF
RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS
THE STATE FROM RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS
THE STATE FROM RIGHTS WHICH BLOCKS
THE STATE FROM
SUSPENDING THE STATE FROM
SUSPENDING THE STATE FROM
SUSPENDING
SOMEONE’S THE STATE FROM
SUSPENDING
SOMEONE’S VEHICLE SUSPENDING
SOMEONE’S VEHICLE SUSPENDING
SOMEONE’S VEHICLE
REGISTRATION SUSPENDING
SOMEONE’S VEHICLE
REGISTRATION FOR SOMEONE’S VEHICLE
REGISTRATION FOR SOMEONE’S VEHICLE
REGISTRATION FOR
UNPAID SOMEONE’S VEHICLE
REGISTRATION FOR
UNPAID CASHLESS REGISTRATION FOR
UNPAID CASHLESS REGISTRATION FOR
UNPAID CASHLESS
TOLLS. UNPAID CASHLESS
TOLLS. UNPAID CASHLESS
TOLLS.
CLAUDINE UNPAID CASHLESS
TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING UNPAID CASHLESS
TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING – TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING – TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING –
CHANNEL TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING –
CHANNEL 2 TOLLS.
CLAUDINE EWING –
CHANNEL 2 NEWS CLAUDINE EWING –
CHANNEL 2 NEWS CHANNEL 2 NEWS CHANNEL 2 NEWS

THANK CHANNEL 2 NEWS

THANK YOU

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *